The management of invasive plants has long been a focus of roadside managers and supporting municipalities. As roadsides are a primary vector for the introduction and spread of invasive plants, municipal and county highway departments often rely on management methods like mowing to control undesirable species. When done properly, mowing can relieve impacted areas. However, this strategy presents several dangers to staff working on busy roadsides, and results can be inconsistent as time and knowledge are often as limited as equipment access and departmental funding.
Through the leadership of Dr. Mark Renz, professor and Extension weed specialist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the university’s Division of Extension began working with private industry practitioners and nonprofits in May 2019 to assess the effects of mowing and hand-removal methods compared with sites on which herbicide applications were used for vegetation management. This research focused on the control of three invasive plants found throughout Wisconsin and across many areas of the country: wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa), wild chervil (Anthriscus sylvestris) and teasel (Dipsacus sp.).
With the help of 4 Control, a regional professional application company specializing in invasive plant control, UW-Madison launched the 2019 Roadside Workshop to improve safety, to protect adjacent habitats from invasive species and to enhance awareness of the results and fiscal benefits herbicide treatments can provide to roadside managers.
“The goal of these workshops is to not only educate individuals on how to manage invasive plants on roadsides but also challenge them to overcome obstacles and start adopting better management practices,” Renz says.
Results from the study showed herbicide applications to be more effective and cost-efficient at controlling invasive plants. As 1 of 9 herbicide applications tested during the Roadside Workshop, TerraVue™ herbicide from Corteva Agriscience efficiently demonstrated the many ways in which properly applied herbicides can consistently outperform mechanized mowing.
Over the course of two months, multiple treatments were tested on a number of small- and large-scale plots within Brown, Chippewa, Kenosha, Portage and Sauk counties. Each workshop included numerous treatment methods and equipment as well as various rates and times of application. While mowing and hand-removal strategies were compared with herbicide-based management techniques on all sites, a wider variety of treatments were included on small-scale plots. Regardless of the application site or invasive species targeted, herbicide treatments consistently demonstrated improved efficacy — and TerraVue presented some of the most promising results.
At a rate of just 2.85 ounces per acre, TerraVue was also 1 of 4 herbicides in the workshop that were shown to provide excellent control of wild parsnip populations. Offering flexible application methods and a low use rate, TerraVue features a new water-dispersible-granule formulation that offers control of over 140 broadleaf weeds and brush species.
“TerraVue mixes well, and it’s an easy product to work with,” says Lee Shambeau, owner of 4 Control. “You don’t use a lot, so you don’t need a lot of product on hand. As a dry product, there’s no concern for storage or freeze-ups.”
In addition to nearly eliminating parsnip and teasel rosettes through fall of the application year, TerraVue was 1 of 4 herbicides to nearly eliminate teasel rosettes in the fall and 1 of 3 herbicides to provide over 90% control of wild chervil for the entire growing season. Comparatively, mowing and hand-weeding methods failed to exceed 77% control of invasive plants in either season. Thus, the use of herbicides yielded significantly better results across the board for each species.
In addition to the enhanced control of invasive plants, the use of herbicides was also shown to reduce the cost of maintenance per application season. While costs for hand removal and mowing methods were estimated at $122 per acre and $70 to $150 per lane mile respectively, the average investment for herbicide treatments was substantially less for individual plant treatments ($13 to $87 per acre) or broadcast treatments ($12 to $65 per acre), which included the cost of application.
“Mowing is much more expensive than spraying herbicide,” Renz says. “What we find is mowing can be effective at preventing seed production and temporarily reduce cover of those plants, but control doesn’t persist through the fall.”
With herbicides enhancing control of invasive plants like wild chervil, wild parsnip and teasel, invasive plant populations were shown to be significantly lower than mowing strategies by the fall.
As a vegetation management method used to aid in controlling incompatible species along roadsides, mowing methods are most effective when timed correctly. As a primary contributor to the 2019 Roadside Workshop, Renz acknowledges the importance of achieving optimum results through prompt maintenance.
“We can prevent or severely reduce the spread of most invasive plants through well-timed mowing,” Renz says. “The challenge is timing. In many cases, there’s a two-to-three-week window when it’s the ideal time to mow.”
Failure to mow at opportune times during each growing season can have adverse effects on vegetation management programs. Mowing too early can allow targeted vegetation to re-sprout and flower, which leads to viable seed production if not addressed by subsequent mowing. Conversely, mowing too late can inadvertently spread seed along roadsides and lead to the spread of invasive species the following year.
With many municipalities relying on limited equipment to maintain thousands of miles of roadsides across Wisconsin, mowing practices alone can take up to two months depending upon the size of each managed area. As timing plays an integral role in the success of vegetation management programs that rely on mowing alone, the 2019 Roadside Workshop demonstrated alternative strategies that can improve vegetation management programs across the state — and nation.
Whereas classroom training alone had failed to generate a shift in management strategies among state highway workers in recent years, the 2019 Roadside Workshop complemented educational discussions with tours of test sites within each county. Renz and workshop partners guided representatives from municipalities, tribal governments, nonprofits, county staff and state agencies through local plots in which each application strategy was tested on the area’s most prevalent invasive species.
“We struggled getting townships and counties to buy in if they didn’t see the results,” Shambeau says. “Once they came on the tour and could see the results, it got them on board.”
To complement the impact of visual results displayed at each application site, workshop partners led classroom sessions to educate attendees on ways to address a general lack of funding. In referencing results generated by herbicide applications, roadside managers were encouraged to highlight long-term savings and approaches to repurposing those savings for an increase in other activities geared toward invasive plant control.
In an effort to assess each workshop’s impact, Renz and team surveyed attendees upon the conclusion of each site tour and corresponding training session. Having received valuable insights regarding the beneficial use of herbicides for roadside management and recommendations for addressing funding needs, capacity limitations or public participation, 93% of those surveyed expressed the intent to change their management methods as a result of the workshop.
“By doing five workshops, we found that those attending managed over 19,000 road miles in Wisconsin,” Renz says. “That’s 19% of our roads.”
As a result of the 2019 Roadside Workshop, over 14,000 road miles managed across the state are now expected to have an improved mapping of invasive plants. Invasive species management plans, herbicide applications and changes to management timing are projected to be applied to more than 12,000 road miles across the state as well.
In the wake of this notable success, there may be plans to increase learning opportunities for local and regional groups.
“We’re looking to continue documenting the impact of the workshop and may try to expand it through other parts of Wisconsin and beyond in the future,” Renz says.
Considering the optimum results generated by herbicide treatments throughout these studies, similar workshops and educational opportunities possess the propensity to influence decisions made by state legislators, departments of transportation, county staff and/or local town boards. To learn more about the 2019 Roadside Workshop and opportunities to improve cost-efficiency, productivity and invasive plant control, click here.
™ ® Trademark of Dow AgroSciences, DuPont or Pioneer, and their affiliated companies or their respective owners. When treating areas in and around roadside or utility rights-of-way that are or will be grazed, hayed or planted to forage, important label precautions apply regarding harvesting hay from treated sites, using manure from animals grazing on treated areas or rotating the treated area to sensitive crops. See the product label for details. TerraVue is not registered for sale or use in all states. Contact your state pesticide regulatory agency to determine if a product is registered for sale or use in your state. Always read and follow label directions.
For over 30 years, Vistas® has covered strategies, trends and stories from across the Vegetation Management industry.